Skip to main content

5 Best Section 508 Compliance Testing Tools (2026)

Last updated: March 31, 2026

TLDR

For government contractors and agencies that need Section 508 compliance documentation, A11yProof ($29/mo) produces criterion-level reports with AI-generated fix guidance. axe DevTools is the developer tool of choice for in-depth 508 testing. ANDI is the free SSA-developed tool required by some agencies. PAC handles PDF accessibility compliance. Siteimprove covers enterprise-level 508 monitoring.

Section 508 Compliance Testing Tools Comparison

Coverage, format, and pricing across 5 Section 508 testing tools

ToolStarting PriceApproachKey Strength
A11yProof$29/moAI scanner + code fixes508 reports with fix guidance
axe DevToolsFree / $40+/moBrowser extension + CIDeveloper 508 testing standard
ANDIFreeManual bookmarkletARIA and keyboard validation
PACFreePDF document checkerPDF 508 compliance testing
Siteimprove$500+/moEnterprise analytics suiteContinuous 508 monitoring + VPAT
01

A11yProof

AI-powered web accessibility scanner that tests against WCAG 2.1 AA and Section 508 criteria and generates code-level fix suggestions per violation.

Pros

  • ✓ WCAG 2.1 AA and Section 508 criterion reporting
  • ✓ AI generates specific code fixes for each violation
  • ✓ Compliance documentation suitable for 508 Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) prep
  • ✓ Multi-site plans from $79/mo for contractors managing multiple projects

Cons

  • × Developer required to implement fix suggestions
  • × Newer platform without long government procurement track record
  • × No free tier
  • × Cannot scan PDF documents — web only

Pricing: $29-$199/mo

Verdict: Best for contractors and agencies that need both scanning and documentation. Criterion-level 508 reporting with AI fix suggestions reduces remediation time compared to tools that only identify violations.

02

axe DevTools

Browser extension and testing library by Deque. Free extension covers manual testing; Pro adds guided testing flows and CI integration with Section 508 reporting.

Pros

  • ✓ Free browser extension with strong Section 508 coverage
  • ✓ Industry-standard axe-core engine
  • ✓ Pro adds VPAT-ready reporting and CI integration
  • ✓ Widely accepted in government development workflows

Cons

  • × Free tier is manual — no site-wide automated scanning
  • × Pro pricing per user scales with team size
  • × No AI-generated fix suggestions
  • × Steep learning curve for non-developers

Pricing: Free (extension), $40+/mo (Pro)

Verdict: Best developer tool for hands-on Section 508 testing. The free extension is sufficient for page-by-page work. Pro adds the CI integration and reporting that contractor shops need.

03

ANDI

Accessible Name and Description Inspector, developed by the Social Security Administration. Free bookmarklet for manual Section 508 testing, particularly ARIA and keyboard accessibility.

Pros

  • ✓ Free tool developed and maintained by SSA
  • ✓ Specifically tuned for Section 508 requirements
  • ✓ Strong ARIA name/description and keyboard testing
  • ✓ Trusted in federal agency testing workflows

Cons

  • × Manual testing only — one element at a time
  • × No automated site scanning
  • × No fix suggestions or compliance reporting
  • × Browser bookmarklet interface — not a modern tool

Pricing: Free (government tool)

Verdict: Best free tool for manual Section 508 compliance work, particularly for ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation. Required by some federal agencies as part of their testing process. Not automated — manual use only.

04

PAC (PDF Accessibility Checker)

Free PDF accessibility checker by the PDF/UA Foundation. Validates PDF documents against PDF/UA and WCAG standards, which are part of Section 508 PDF requirements.

Pros

  • ✓ Free tool for PDF accessibility compliance
  • ✓ Tests against PDF/UA and WCAG 2.1 standards
  • ✓ Covers the document gap that web-only tools miss
  • ✓ Used by accessibility practitioners for PDF validation

Cons

  • × PDF-only — does not test web pages
  • × Desktop application — not cloud-based
  • × Manual file-by-file testing
  • × No fix suggestions

Pricing: Free

Verdict: Best tool for PDF Section 508 compliance testing. Section 508 applies to documents as well as websites. If your agency or project produces PDFs, PAC covers the document side that web scanners miss.

05

Siteimprove

Enterprise website quality platform with Section 508 and WCAG scanning as part of its accessibility module. Includes VPAT reporting features.

Pros

  • ✓ Continuous automated 508 and WCAG monitoring
  • ✓ VPAT reporting and accessibility issue tracking
  • ✓ Strong dashboards for tracking compliance over time
  • ✓ Established platform with government procurement history

Cons

  • × Starting at $500+/mo — not viable for small contractors
  • × Annual contracts required
  • × Accessibility is one module in a broader suite
  • × No AI-generated code fix suggestions

Pricing: $500+/mo

Verdict: Best for large federal contractors or enterprise teams that need continuous 508 monitoring across large site portfolios with dedicated VPAT reporting support. Priced for enterprise, not SMBs.

Found your pick?

Try A11yProof free — no setup fees, scanning in under 5 minutes.

How We Evaluated

We looked at each tool through the lens of a government contractor or agency developer responsible for delivering Section 508-compliant websites. The criteria: does it produce documentation government auditors accept? Does it cover the testing scenarios agencies require? And does it fit the budget of a small-to-mid-size contractor shop?

We weighted compliance reporting heavily because 508 compliance is a documentation problem as much as a technical one. Finding violations is useful. Producing a report that documents what was tested, what was found, and what was remediated is what agencies and contracting officers need.

Web vs Document Compliance

Section 508 covers both web content and documents. Most web accessibility tools — including A11yProof, axe DevTools, and ANDI — test web pages only. PDF compliance requires separate tooling.

If your agency work involves producing PDFs, slide decks, or other electronic documents, include PAC in your testing workflow alongside your web scanner of choice. A perfectly accessible website that ships inaccessible PDF reports fails 508 compliance.

ANDI’s Role in Agency Workflows

ANDI (Accessible Name and Description Inspector) is not the most powerful tool on this list, but its government lineage matters. SSA developed it specifically for Section 508 testing, and some agency testing procedures reference it by name. If you work with federal agencies, confirm whether their testing standards require ANDI before deciding to skip it.

For most projects, ANDI works best as a supplemental tool alongside broader scanning. It excels at validating ARIA attributes and keyboard focus behavior — areas where its element-by-element inspection provides more detail than automated scanners.

Choosing Between A11yProof and axe DevTools for 508 Work

The practical difference is fix guidance versus testing depth. axe DevTools gives developers tight integration with their coding workflow — test while you build, catch issues before they reach the site. A11yProof scans the finished site, generates a compliance report, and produces AI-suggested code fixes for what it finds.

For contract shops with small development teams, A11yProof’s fix suggestions reduce the accessibility expertise required to remediate violations. Instead of researching WCAG remediation guidance, developers get specific code changes to implement. For larger teams with dedicated accessibility practitioners, axe DevTools’ depth and CI integration may be the better fit.

Q&A

What tools do government contractors use for Section 508 compliance testing?

Most government contractors use a combination of tools: axe DevTools for developer-level browser testing, ANDI for ARIA and keyboard-specific validation that some agencies require, and A11yProof or Siteimprove for site-wide automated scanning with compliance reporting. PAC handles PDF document compliance separately.

Q&A

What is the difference between Section 508 and WCAG 2.1 AA for web testing purposes?

The 2018 Section 508 refresh harmonized with WCAG 2.0 Level AA, meaning that meeting WCAG 2.0 AA generally satisfies the web content requirements of Section 508. Most modern tools test against WCAG 2.1 AA, which is a superset. Testing to WCAG 2.1 AA meets Section 508 web requirements and provides additional coverage.

Find a better way to handle accessibility

Does my website need to comply with Section 508 even if I'm not a federal agency?
Section 508 applies directly to federal agencies and federally-funded programs. However, federal contractors building websites for government clients must also comply. If you receive federal funding or contract work from a federal agency, Section 508 applies to deliverables. Private companies with no federal relationship follow the ADA, which courts have interpreted to require WCAG 2.1 AA compliance.
What is a VPAT and which tools help prepare one?
A Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) is a document that describes how a product meets Section 508 and WCAG standards. It is required when selling software to federal agencies. axe DevTools Pro and Siteimprove offer VPAT-ready reporting. A11yProof's criterion-level compliance reports provide the underlying data needed to populate a VPAT, though producing the final VPAT document requires additional steps.
Is ANDI required or just recommended for Section 508 testing?
ANDI is not universally required but is the preferred testing tool for some federal agencies, including SSA itself. Some agency-specific testing standards reference ANDI by name. Check your specific agency or contract requirements. For most projects, ANDI combined with axe DevTools or A11yProof covers the testing breadth that 508 audits expect.
How do I test PDF documents for Section 508 compliance?
Section 508 requires accessible PDFs under the document and media requirements. PAC (PDF Accessibility Checker) is the most widely used free tool for this. For PDFs created in Adobe Acrobat, the built-in Accessibility Checker provides additional validation. ANDI cannot test PDFs. Web scanners like A11yProof and axe DevTools are web-only and will not catch PDF issues.

Keep reading